Ayodhya verdict: Allahabad High Court says divide land in 3 ways,Sunni Wakf Board to appeal against

Allahabad High Court has pronounced verdict on the Ayodhya title suit. Senior advocate and BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad emerged from court today to say that the three-judge bench had ruled in a majority judgement 2:1, that one-third part of the disputed land should be given to the Sunni Waqf Board, one-third to the Nirmohi Akhara and one-third to the party for 'Ram Lalla'.



 The site of the Ram lala idol to Lord Ram, Nirmohi Akhara gets gets Sita Rasoi and Ram Chabutara and Sunni Wakf Board gets the rest.
Ravi Shankar Prasad claimed the court had ruled that the place where the idol of Ram was kept was the birthplace of the deity and the idols should not removed.
Prasad claimed that the court had asked for a status quo for three months and in that time the litigants had to decide how to split the party.
The dispute at hand is about whether the 2.7 acres of disputed land on which the Babri Masjid stood before it was demolished on December 6, 1992, belongs to the Sunni Central Waqf Board or to the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha.
It has been a protracted legal battle, and people across the country have spoken in one voice on the need to maintain peace and harmony irrespective of the verdict.
Source : NDTV and Economic Times