Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Gujarat University teachers ask state government to decide pay scale issue in two days
The Gujarat State Federation of University and College Teachers Association that is agitating for over a month over the issue of their pay scales has decided to give an extension of two days to the government to meet their demands.
The association, unhappy with the revised general resolution (GR) of the state government about their pay scale, is protesting against the government failure to decide their pay structure as per the University Grants Commission (UGC) norms.
The teaching community reacted strongly when a GR passed by the state education department on October 6 specified the pay structure of the university and college teachers as per the recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission. The teachers’ federation started state-wide protest agitation and organised programmes like presenting ‘blood-sprinkled’ bouquets to officials and sending protest letters signed in blood to the Education Department
The federation postponed their protests before the state education department released the revised GR on November 11. However, later, the federation described the revised GR a ‘deception’ in the name of UGC provisions.
Prof K S Shastri, the president of the federation, said, “The new GR is a deception as it is a copy of the old GR. Almost 80 per cent of the UGC provisions have been ignored in it. Moreover, there is no change in the provision of application of service rules of the state government.”
Following the new GR, the federation had decided to continue with the agitation programmes and gave a final deadline to the Education Department to make the necessary changes.
Source : Indian Express.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
All the information published in this webpage is submitted by users or free to download on the internet. I make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this page and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis. All the other pages you visit through the hyper links may have different privacy policies. If anybody feels that his/her data has been illegally put in this webpage, or if you are the rightful owner of any material and want it removed please email me at "shyamali00@gmail.com" and I will remove it immediately on demand. All the other standard disclaimers also apply.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(
459
)
-
▼
November
(
26
)
- Bank wage arrears to be paid by Feb. 2010
- No raise in retirement age of Central govt employe...
- SBI officers threaten to go on strike
- UFBU SIGNS MINUTES WITH IBA : Pension Option with ...
- Assam assures revised UGC scale, Madhya Pradesh de...
- IBA, bank union to meet over wage revision on 27th...
- Central Excise, Customs official protest in Delhi ...
- Bipartite Meeting between UFBU and IBA probably on...
- Assam University Teachers demand pay hike, launche...
- AICTE Pay revison for Polytechnic Teachers : Commi...
- Gujarat University teachers ask state government t...
- Govt order enhanced GP of Rs.4600 to Assistants in...
- 6500-10500 pre revised scale has been granted 4600...
- Vidyalaya Vikas Nidhi charged by Kendriya Vidyalay...
- All India Bank Strike on 16-12-09. Not for wage re...
- Gujarat Teachers' salaries according to UGC scales...
- New PSU bank staff to get NPS (New Pension Scheme)
- Tamil nadu extends Pay Commission benefit to TNEB ...
- Bank Wage Revision : Are the Unions leaders in bac...
- Jammu and Kashmir Govt promises pay release to SRT...
- PSEB employees hold protest against anomalies in w...
- Bank Wage Hike : Details of UFBU meeting in Chenna...
- Patna High Court orders pay hike for civil court s...
- Bank Bipartite : No progress yet.
- IITs set up committee for incentive scheme to faculty
- Pay report irks Assam employees.
-
▼
November
(
26
)
1 comment :
A Special court in Anand has ordered an inquiry into a complaint of corruption filed against Anand Agricultural University (AAU) Vice-Chancellor MC Varshneya and Registrar V P Macwan. The duo is accused of corrupt practices in the appointments and promotions of the assistant professors over the last three years.
Special Judge Shashikala Trivedi on Tuesday ordered a DySP-level inquiry under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 and the Indian Penal Code
Vinodchandra Bhatt, former president of the AAU administrative staff association, had filed a complaint pointing out seven discrepancies in appointment and the promotions of the assistant professors in the university.
According to him, all rules, including that of the Indian Council for Agriculture Research (ICAR), University Grants Commission (UGC) and university, have been flouted by the vice-chancellor.
Ads by Google
A lot of money has exchanged hands in the appointments of assistant professors. It has also reached the top bosses in the state government to remain silent,” said Bhatt.
The complaint was instituted at the special court on September 14 and heard the next day. “The judge ordered the inquiry under Section 156 (3) of the CrPC,” said Vijay Kotecha, lawyer for the complainant.
Citing instances of irregularities from the complaint, Bhatt said AAU recruited a total of 20 assistant professors without the National Eligibility Test (NET) certificate, which is mandatory for appointment as assistant professor or equivalent for PhD students. “First the university asked them to complete NET during probation, then they were given extension up to three years for clearing NET. This, even when their contract says their recruitment will stand cancelled if they are not able to clear NET,” he said.
... contd.
Around 82 agriculture officers were promoted as assistant professors, some of them even without NET certificate. This cannot happen without under-the-table-transaction, alleged Bhatt, adding that as per rules, there is no provision for promotion.
The university promoted around 32 assistant professors in 2008 and 50 in 2009 in violation of rules, states the complaint
Earlier, Bhatt had complained about this to the government four times. “Higher ups in the government are also part of this. Therefore, no action was taken,” he alleged
Post a Comment