Monday, August 23, 2010

Indian Bank circular on pension with option for continuing CPF.

IBA issued guidelines on Pension to Banks on 1oth Aug 2010 with two Annexures. ie. Anx.1 and  2 for working staff as well as for  retired staff.
Now Indian Bank  issued circular ,of course with all details  on pension,but with one   more annexure for those who are not opting pension !!


Download the circular
Provided by Mr Mohan P.



4 comments :

raamraam said...

thank god they have not asked NOC letter from chitra gupthaa &countersigned by lord YAMAA

mahesh agrawal said...

Dear sir,
i think it would be better to file different writ petitions at different places either on the basis of homogenity of group/bank wise and the same should be done with out wastage of time....Immediately after denial of pension option by the bank,the action is to be geared up...First of all token amount for joining the membership should be collected and afterwards the amount as being spent from time to time may be collected from the members....Relevant decided cases notice in the members should be placed on the blog for ready reference by the lawyers...Ihe important thing is that the lawyer well versed with service matters /cases should be engaged who can impress upon the injustice and unconstitutional provisions in the option agreement....Not only the pension option but the right of pension option after deletion of break in service due to strike clause and hence no penalty /cost should be impressed upon....I am sure that IBA/Banks will be defeated and the provision for recovery of cost and maintaining the suit should be recovered from erring officials who knowingly deprived VRS optees to opt pension....
M.C.Agrawal
mca1957@rediffmail.com

mahesh agrawal said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
mahesh agrawal said...

Dear Members,
Kindly send the copy of high court judgements cases to your banker and opt pension and impress upon the the management to seek clarification from IBA in view of decided cases whereby they can not make any distinction between retired on superannnuation and retired voluntarily under service regulations of the bank.
mca1957@rediffmail.com
case:1.the Supreme court (Bank of India Vs Rajagoplan et al in a Civil Application # 6959 of 1999) and Madras Court (in the writ petition No 2377 of 2001 - Abdul Sattar HAL Vs Union Bank of India)
2.The Judgment of Hon Mumbai High Court in the case Madhav Kiritikar Vs Bank of India puts the doubts at rest regarding unquestionable eligibility of Voluntarily retired officers opting for pension.

Contact Us

Viewers may share any information with the administrator in this email shyamali00@gmail.com
Any news, if approved, may be published in this blog under his /her name.

.................RECENT HEADLINES

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Blog Archive

Bookmark This Page

Bookmark and Share
All the information published in this webpage is submitted by users or free to download on the internet. I make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this page and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis. All the other pages you visit through the hyper links may have different privacy policies. If anybody feels that his/her data has been illegally put in this webpage, or if you are the rightful owner of any material and want it removed please email me at "shyamali00@gmail.com" and I will remove it immediately on demand. All the other standard disclaimers also apply.